IMD

You are here: Home
       
Share


Seeing stars – all six of them!

E-mail Print PDF

By: Ilana Koegelenberg – assistant editor*

With sea water heat exchange and an underfloor displacement ventilation (UDV) system, the No 1 Silo building is on course to make history with a prestigious 6-star rating and an innovation credit from the Green Building Council.

DPS001
The Silo No.1 building at the V&A Waterfront in Cape Town.

The No 1 Silo building at the Victoria & Albert waterfront in Cape Town is specifically designed as the corporate head office of Allan Gray. But a long-term tenant that values staff wellness, put a high priority on whole-of-life costs and environmental responsibility – and gave the design of the HVAC system an importance beyond what is normally found in an A-grade office.

Design specifications

At the beginning of the project the V&A, Allan Gray and the core design team visited Australia to learn first hand from the experiences of building owners, occupants and facilities managers owning, living and working in green buildings. Australia has its own operational energy benchmarking tool: the National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS), which is widely adopted and was recently legislated as mandatory for all office buildings being sold or leased. This has put special emphasis on energy efficiency and specifically energy-efficient HVAC design for the base buildings in Australia. The two systems that achieved high NABERS ratings were passive chilled beams and underfloor displacement ventilation (UDV) systems.

Returning to South Africa the team investigated the merits of these two systems, in conjunction with a more conventional variable air volume (VAV) system. The client and the design team decided on an UDV system mainly due to the ease and flexibility of electrical distribution the raised floor system offers. The cost of the raised floor was almost exclusively offset against the reduced cost and environmental impact of churn throughout the life of the building. The increased health benefits of a UDV system was a close second, whereas the energy consumption is similar to that of a chilled beam system and about 10% more efficient than a traditional VAV system.

In this UDV system air is supplied to a floor void from air-handling units on the roof. Air is let into the space at low velocity via grilles placed in the floor. The temperature of the air is a few degrees below room temperature. As it picks up heat from occupants and equipment it rises, taking pollutants with it to a high level where it is extracted back to the air-handling unit on the roof.

Sea water plant room
The sea water plant room.

An UDV system not only controls pollutant levels, but also reduces the risk of cross-contamination over a conventional mixing system by providing low-velocity vertical laminar flow from bottom to top, thus not mixing air from one work space to another.

In the Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Associations (REHVA)’s published book, Displacement ventilation in non-industrial premises it states that ‘the contamination concentration is always better in the occupied zone in a displacement-ventilation room than in a room ventilated by mixing ventilation’. According to REHVA the air change effectiveness in a displacement ventilation system is mostly higher (60%-70%) than a mixing ventilation system (50%).

Another innovative feature of the building is the sea water heat exchange replacing the need for cooling towers. This system comprises of three fully independent titanium plate heat exchangers (each with dedicated supply and return sea water pipework, sea water pumps and filters) operating in a duty/duty/ standby configuration to provide full N+1 redundancy. Condensed water from the main building chillers pass through these plate heat exchangers, at which point it gets cooled by heat transfer between condenser water and sea water. All the sea water pipework are installed in medium or high-density polyethylene (MDPE and HDPE) and no insulation is required.

The nature and magnitude of the environmental benefits are:
• Chillers last 5-10 years longer due to full control over the condenser water quality
• The use of domestic water (in cooling towers) is avoided
• Increased chiller coefficient of performance (COP) from five (air-cooled chillers) to eight, therefore the chiller electrical consumption is almost halved due to a decrease in the condenser water temperatures
• The elimination of the risk of legionella.

Part load

With sea water temperatures in Cape Town harbour ranging from 12°C-16°C it is expected that the chiller will regularly work at a COP of eight.

The V&A already have two sea water systems in operation which enabled feedback on the operations and maintenance regime for a feasibility study. Arup also undertook a full environmental study to prove to the necessary authorities that the design would bear no negative impact on the harbour and its marine life.

Challenges

The dust house
The dust house.

The development also incorporates the tenant’s data centre for which the requirement was to achieve a Tier 3 rating. However, to meet the client’s and tenant’s aspirations on energy reduction, it was impossible to use dual independent air-cooled chillers to achieve the rating. The design thus provides chilled water to the data centre from the highly efficient base building chilled-water system for normal day-to-day operation, with a single air-cooled chiller, dedicated to the data centre only, providing the necessary backup. Integrating the two systems proved to be a challenge due to their differing operating characteristics.

Budget

The capital cost of the system is higher than a conventional system specifically around the sea water heat exchange. The team went through extensive value engineering exercises during design development and detailed design to reduce the capital cost. They took a balanced approach to ensure that they still meet the client brief, don’t compromise any whole-of-life benefits and provide a value for money system.

Product choices

The silo no 1 building is still under construction
The Silo No.1 building is still under construction.

In the original scheme the building was served by independent chillers and heat pumps (for respectively cooling and heating). As part of the value engineering process the team finally incorporated the use of fully reversible heat pumps to meet both heating and cooling requirements. The heat pumps were also selected on their capability to operate at significantly reduced condenser water temperatures (from traditional cooling towers) to make best use of the sea water heat exchange system. Three units are used, any two of which meet the building cooling load, with the third unit doing double duty: meeting the building heating load in day-to-day operation, and providing back-up to the two units in chilling mode in the event of a failure.

The challenge incorporating the reversible heat pumps was that the change-over had to be accommodated within the chilled water, heating water, and sea water heat exchange pipework connections to the heat pump: in heating mode the evaporator bundle is connected to the sea water, and in chilling mode the condenser bundle is connected to the sea water. This means that all three systems are interlinked (via the change-over valves) and, therefore, need to operate at the same pressures and with the same chemical dosing regimes.

The offices are provided with air conditioned air via a pressurised floor void. This allows for stratification of the air within the occupied zone and enhanced ventilation effectiveness. An additional benefit is that the supply air temperature is elevated (above the industry standard) at about 18°C, meaning that the periods when the AHU economiser cycle may be used is greatly extended with significant energy cost savings.

The air handling plant room
The air-handling plant room.

With very few exceptions all pumps and fans are on variable speed drives, with the unit speed adjusting to meet the imposed load. This provides significant electrical energy savings. The only situation where constant speed pumps are used, is where the pump is matched to a plant item with a constant flow requirement – for example the chiller primary pumps. Constant speed fans are provided where code requirements stipulate air flow rates.

The reversible heat pumps each have dual independent refrigerant circuits (with dual power supplies) to provide additional redundancy, but this also allows the unit to turn-down significantly to meet the imposed load without the unit having to cycle on and off.

The use of evaporative cooling was reviewed, but, with the benefits of the sea water heat exchange system and the elevated supply air temperature, was not viable.

Impact on electrical use

As part of the design process and Green Star certification, a full energy model was carried out. Various complexities of models were used from the conceptual stage to test alternatives and make informed design decisions. From the double skin façade performance through to chiller selection was tested. The final model shows that the building has the potential to consume 60% less energy than the base case SANS 10400(XA) compliant building. The HVAC system will contribute about 45% of the building’s final energy consumption. It will be tuned by the contractor and the relevant design team members through the first year of operation with re-commissioning after a year.

A pleasant surprise is the effectiveness of the CO monitoring system controlling the basement ventilation system. The design team was aware of the positive energy data collected from an Arup-designed Green Star building in Sydney, but it wasn’t until they undertook a detailed investigation that they realised the significance.

The floor was raised
The floor was raised to accommodate the under-
floor displacement ventilation system.

The system consists of two separate types of fans. The first is the main extract fans that exhaust the air from the basement. The second is the impulse fans that move air from the interior of the car park to the exhaust grilles on the perimeter. The main extract fans are fitted with VSD drives and the schedule, as per the CIR, is used to turn down the fan speed to achieve the required air flow. The impulse fans are also controlled by CO censors, but they switch on or off based on the censors. This system will results in energy consumption of less than 10% compared to a conventional fix airflow basement extracts system.

Green innovation

Both the UDV system and the sea water heat exchange system received an innovation credit from the Green Building Council for being one of the first in South Africa – and this contributed to the building achieving a 6-star Green Star Office Design rating.

Compliance

Due to the building’s double skin façade and efficient HVAC system the building well exceeds the new SANS10400(XA) energy-efficiency codes. The fresh air rate for the building also exceeds the latest codes by 75%. The Environmental Impact Assessment that was done for the sea water system did, however, impose strict design criteria: limiting the overall heat transfer; the sea-water discharge temperature rise; imposing strict inlet and discharge velocities; dictating the physical location of the inlets and discharges; and prohibiting materials (for example uPVC) and dosing chemicals (for the control of marine growth).

*With inputs by Nic Smith, associate mechanical services and Jaco Kemp, associate and sustainable building specialist at Arup on behalf of the V&A Waterfront.

 

Share
 

Alec Johannsen: thinking outside the box

E-mail Print PDF

By: Ilana Koegelenberg – assistant editor

In a unique approach, Dr Alec Johannsen combines his expertise in research and computer programming to tackle HVAC challenges

Alec Johannsen not only runs a HVAC consulting engineering practice, but is also involved with the development of BSIMAC software, used primarily to design air conditioning systems and carry out ‘rational design’ for energy efficiency in compliance with SANS 10400-XA. He also does ‘rational design’ for energy efficiency as a service to architects and other HVAC engineers.

 

Background

Resized
Alec Johannsen believes in building
experience on a solid foundation of
sound scientific principles.

Engineering runs in Johannsen’s family: his father was a civil engineer and his grandfather a mining engineer. “I still have the original Order of Merit my grandfather received from Tsar Nicolas II.”

In his early student years, Johannsen became fascinated by thermodynamics and fluid mechanics as these systems seemed ‘alive’ to him. He obtained an MSc (Eng) degree specialising in HVAC installations at the Warsaw Institute of Technology in 1961, and a DSc (Eng) degree at the University of Pretoria in 1983.

Before going into consulting, Johannsen spent over 20 years at the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) focussing on thermodynamics, including HVAC systems. He acquired some basic computer programming skills and soon started applying it in his research work. This resulted in the production of computer-drawn psychrometric charts for different altitudes. Some of these charts, in a laminated form are still in use in the industry.

“My move to private consulting was an attempt to put into practice what I had learned in research – with due regard for all the practical issues, not least the cost aspects.”

Future

Johannsen is happy to continue within the broad area of his interest but is always looking for challenging and interesting projects. “Thermal modelling of buildings with passive or active cooling and heating systems, and energy-efficient design are likely to become increasingly important and I would like to continue and increase my involvement in these areas.”

A word of advice

Johannsen suggests that young people build their experience on the solid foundation of sound scientific principles. “If you rely only on experience, you may one day face an unfamiliar situation with which you don’t have any experience. You will then likely be lost unless sound theoretical background guides you to a successful solution.”

Projects

Johannsen has been involved with the Mossgas and Medupi projects, some multi-storey office buildings, churches and hospitals. Less conventional was the development of software packages for the simulation of evaporation rates from industrial effluent dams and the design of refrigerated beer tanks.

Motivation

As with most engineers, Johannsen feels great satisfaction after a successfully completed project. “I sometimes experience a sense of awe when a functioning system can be seen as proof that seemingly abstract and sometimes complex formulae do in fact represent real life, make sense, and help us in achieving our design goals.”

 

Share
 

Humidity matters

E-mail Print PDF

By: Duncan Buxton of JS Humidifiers

Sensitive babies, coagulation, expensive electrical equipment, electrostatic shocks and stress are just some of the reasons why it is essential to maintain the correct humidity in hospital environments.

This is especially true in the winter months when heating systems are turned on, as this can dramatically dry the air causing atmospheric moisture levels to drop as low as 15%-20% relative humidity (%rH). The Humidity Group of the HEVAC Association recommends that a healthy level is between 40%-60%rH. Levels below this can be harmful in normal working environments, causing breathing problems, headaches, sore throats and increasing staff absenteeism through stress. However, in hospital environments the effects are much more severe.

Low relative humidity in the atmosphere of an operating theatre will cause the air to draw moisture from all possible sources in the room – including any body tissue exposed during operations. This can cause premature drying and promote the formation of a scab from coagulated blood during operations. By maintaining an optimum humidity of between 50%-60%rH, drying of body tissue is prevented.

Perhaps more important in theatre is the effect of electrostatic shocks which build up below 40%rH. The uncomfortable, surprising jolts caused by a sudden ‘static discharge’ can have potentially damaging and dangerous effects on surgery, and consideration must also be given to the prevention of electrostatic sparks in relation to flammable anaesthetic gases.

As well as causing discomfort and hazards to people, the low humidity levels that increase electrostatic build-up pose a real threat to electrical equipment. Radiology departments contain very sensitive and expensive equipment that can be easily damaged by static sparks. By maintaining humidity levels of above 45%rH, static build-up can be eliminated.

Young babies are also extremely susceptible to dry air. Membranes in the throat and nose can very easily dry out when the humidity drops below 45%rH. For this reason, humidity levels in maternity and obstetric departments should be maintained at 45%-65%rH. For many adults with respiratory problems, low rH can exacerbate their condition as mucosae lose moisture to the environment.

In fact, there are few areas in hospital that don’t benefit from humidification. The problem can often be a compromise between those areas that need it (ironically, directives govern rH levels for laboratory animals but not for the rest of a hospital), and the running costs of humidifiers in a sector where budgets are always tight.

Moisture can be introduced to the atmosphere of an air handling system by either releasing a fine mist of cold water or steam, both of which are absorbed by the airflow. Hospital environments require absolute sterility so it is important to ensure any system has failsafe hygiene features. Steam is a very popular solution in hospitals as it ensures the moisture being introduced is 100% safe and also due to the fact that there is often a ready supply of steam being used for sterilising purposes.

However site steam is not always ‘clean steam’, as it may contain additives that make it unsuitable for steam humidification. JS has systems that will take ‘process steam’ or high temperature hot water and produce clean sterile steam at atmospheric pressure, making steam humidification extremely simple. Electric steam humidifiers have been used in some hospitals but these can prove expensive to run particularly on large fresh air plants feeding operating theatres where the running hours can be quite considerable over a 12 month period.

Some hospitals have explored the option of cold water humidification, including compressed air and water sprays, evaporative systems and in some cases ultrasonic humidifiers. In all of these systems it is imperative that steps are taken to ensure that there is no microbiological risk from the system. JS offers the only range of cold water humidifiers that meet the latest Health and Safety Commission ACOP L8. This guarantees that all water is treated by ultraviolet sterilising systems to ensure that there is no microbiological risk and all systems have drain-down option when not in use. These are crucial to correct operation of cold water humidifiers.

Humidifier selection is often largely dependent on energy costs. Steam, however it is generated, consumes 0,75kW per kilogram of steam produced. Compressed air and water sprays use about 10% of the power of a steam humidifier and evaporative humidification will typically use less than 1% of the power that a steam humidifier requires. Therefore if steam is not available there are low cost alternatives to having to run expensive steam mains or run large electrical loads to achieve the desired humidity.

Designing a humidification system for a hospital environment is a detailed process, and each unit should be tailored to the specific installation. Consideration must be given to the design of the air handling system that will carry the moisture, the rate of air flow through the system, the size of the ducts and pipes, and many other factors. This is to ensure 100% absorption of the moisture into the atmosphere of the air handling duct. Even with steam, if this is not achieved and moisture is allowed to condense or gather within a duct, contamination may occur. This can lead to problems of microbiological contamination of the duct work.

Share
 

Updates to ASHRAE residential IAQ standard

E-mail Print PDF

The newly published 2013 version of ASHRAE’s residential indoor air quality standard removes the default leakage rate assumption and also requires carbon monoxide alarms.

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.2-2013, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings, is the only nationally recognised standard developed solely for residences. It defines the roles of and minimum requirements for mechanical and natural ventilation systems and the building envelope intended to provide acceptable indoor air quality in low-rise residential buildings.

One of the biggest changes in the standard over the 2010 version was an increase in mechanical ventilation rates to 7,5cfm per person plus 3cfm per 100ft2(30,5m2). This is due to the earlier removal of the default assumption regarding natural infiltration.

The Standard 62.2 Committee had previously assumed homes got a minimum of 2cfm, per 100ft2, according to Don Stevens, committee chair.

“Because research shows houses have gotten tighter and apartments have always been tight, the 2013 edition drops this default assumption and calls for the entire amount to be provided mechanically,” he said. “The only exception is when single family homes have a blower door test – then the predicted average annual leakage rate can be deducted.”

Another major change is a requirement for carbon monoxide (CO) alarms in all dwelling units. CO poisoning leads to hundreds of deaths annually in homes, resulting from automobiles left running in attached garages, as well as from portable generators, power tools and heaters, according to Paul Francisco, committee vice-chair. A small fraction of poisoning also result from failed central heating combustion appliances.

“Residents have little ability to sense the presence of CO without detectors, unlike many other indoor polluting events,” he said.

Whether to include CO alarms as a requirement in the standard had been discussed since the standard was first proposed, with the debate focused on the unreliability and cost of alarms.

Francisco said the committee believes the time has come to make this change, noting that it brings the standard into closer alignment with the International Residential Code, which requires alarms if the house has combustion appliances or attached garages, and with many states that have passed laws requiring CO alarms.

The requirement goes a step further, expanding the protection to all homes, regardless of fuel type or garage configuration, reflecting the fact that many CO exposures occur due to causes completely independent of these factors, he said. It also requires that alarms be hard-wired with battery backup to address an increased likelihood of high CO exposure events during power outages.

Other significant new changes include the removal of the climate limitations on pressurisation and depressurisation; specifications related specifically to multifamily buildings; and new calculations and weather data for estimating annual leakage based on a blower door test.

The cost of Standard 62.2-2013, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings, is $58 (R520) or $48 (R430) for ASHRAE members).

To order, contact ASHRAE customer contact centre at (00)1 404-636-8400 or visit www.ashrae.org/bookstore.

Share
 

JSE annex refurbishment: getting with the times

E-mail Print PDF

By: Patrick Burke of RPM Consulting Engineers

When it comes to refurbishing HVAC systems from the eighties, the challenges are plentiful and bringing in VRFs, is no small feat

The original Johannesburg Stock Exchange annex’ HVAC system was a state-of-the-art installation in the eighties, but the system has not only aged, but is also outdated. It was time for a refurbishment – and to bring in the variable refrigerant flow (VRF) units.

The JSE annex in Diagonal Street in the Johannesburg CBD, has three floors above ground and three levels of basement parking, taking up a total of about 8 000m² of office space.

The old system

JSE 001
Condensing section system one
and two.

The annex was initially air conditioned to the usual high standards of the day, being built in the mid-eighties. Each floor was served by three to four water-cooled packaged units located in designated built-up plant rooms. Cooling towers at roof level took care of the heat rejection requirements. Conditioned air was distributed throughout by insulated sheet-metal ductwork, with fan air terminals (FATs) providing the secondary control within each zone.

This design concept and type of installation was popular throughout the seventies and eighties. In effect, it pioneered the variable air volume concept, thus providing better individual control and improving conditions throughout.

All in all, it was a well-designed system, using the high quality equipment available at the time.

However, age, together with wear and tear, had taken its inevitable toll to the extent that the existing plant had now reached the end of its economic design life. It was time to replace the plant.

Design considerations

JSE 002
Schematics of the typical fresh air detail of the system.

Various design options presented themselves, from a like-for-like option, to a chilled water generating plant.

The current building usage, an education and training facility, eventually determined the way forward. Gone were the individual small offices, open-plan areas and the like. These were replaced with classrooms, study areas, recreational areas and individual offices. Clearly a more flexible arrangement was needed.

After careful consideration, the design engineers opted for a VRF system, with full heat-reclaim components. This would allow for the necessary zoning requirements, independent operational use and individual control function throughout.

It furthermore provided for better internal layout flexibility, while at the same time allowed for the work to be carried out within a fully tenanted building.

In terms of energy savings, the VRF concept offers impressive efficiency figures, particularly at part-load conditions. Being an air-cooled application, the original central condenser water system in place (cooling towers, pump sets, etc.) will subsequently be eliminated completely, resulting in considerable anticipated savings with regards to water usage, chemical requirements and routine maintenance costs.

Application: phase one
Phase one included the refurbishment of the first floor of the building only. The final design called for a total of six systems or zones to serve the 2 900m² floor area. Each system comprised between five OFF and eight OFF 9,0 KWR above-ceiling ducted hide-away units, served by a single (modular) outdoor condensing unit.

JSE 004
The new condensing section
systems three and four.

The existing above-ceiling FATs were each replaced with a hide-away unit and the existing secondary supply air ductwork reused for the purpose of supply air. The original existing main supply air duct was suitably blanked off where applicable and reused to provide the necessary fresh air requirement (venting in close proximity to each new hide-away unit).

Each of the above-ceiling indoor units is individually controlled, the relevant controller being mounted against the ceiling to prevent tampering by the occupants.

New constant volume diffusers were installed throughout to suit the revised layout.

The fresh air to the floor is provided by a dedicated variable speed axial flow fan in the original air conditioning plant room. Filtered fresh air is delivered to each indoor unit via the original supply air ducting. The required minimum fresh air to each unit is manually set through a balancing damper.

Energy savings
As the new system provides a full heat-reclaim function, the winter heating requirements are available to each individual hide-away unit on demand, achieving energy savings of over 50% compared to conventional resistance-type heater elements.

JSE 005
The ceiling-mounted controllers
looked like this.

Why VRF?
The VRF concept offers an energy efficient and extremely flexible means of conditioning large multiple use areas. It allows for precise independent control of indoor conditions, zone by zone, without impacting on overall comfort levels or specific occupancy requirements.

With this type of application, the amount of fresh air to the building is paramount. In view of this, outdoor air is delivered in accordance with an intelligent CO2 monitoring control system and a variable speed fresh-air fan arrangement.

Phase two
The first floor has been successfully completed and commissioned, with promising results in phase one. The second phase consists of floors two and the upper ground. Once implemented, it will, in effect, complete the project: the original water-cooled system will be fully decommissioned and shut down, having served the building well for the last 25 years.

Budget and lifespan

At R856 per m², the final project cost compared favourably with that of a budget-engineered chilled water system (± R1 000 per m²) and is set to provide a further 15-20 years of economic operation.

Project team

Client:  Hostprops 85 (Pty) Ltd
Design and Project Management:  RPM Consulting Engineers
Contractor:  Blue Hemisphere (Pty) Ltd
VRF Equipment:  Mitsubishi Electric City Multi
Suppliers:  MS Airconditioning Distributors, Europair

Share
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 19
   

Advertising RACA

Please update your Flash Player to view content.

Newsletter

Plumbing Africa Newsletter
RACA Newsletter
Cold Chain Newsletter
Design & Technology Newsletter
Mining Newsletter
Technology in Architecture Newsletter


Receive HTML?
Code:

RACA Events

There are no upcoming events currently scheduled.
View full calendar

Latest Poll

Did you attend the first mining show of the year at Swartklip?
 

Contact Details

Head Office:
13A Riley Road, Bedfordview
2007, South Africa   

Tel: (011) 579 4940
Fax: (011) 450 1920
International: 0027 (0)11 579 4940
Email: admin@interactmedia.co.za

Web Links